Cases 71 - 80 of 86
LEWIS v. DOC COMMISSIONER DAVID DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv00458
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS
Defendant:
DOC COMMISSIONER DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, DR. WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMLET v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2007cv00440
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, PHIL SLAVENS, T. RIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Donahue et al
as 3:2007cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robbie Davis
Defendant:
J David Donahue, William Wilson, Andrew Pazera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Donahue et al
as 3:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robbie Davis
Defendant:
J David Donahue, William Wilson, Andrew Pazera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Daniels et al
as 3:2007cv00104
Plaintiff:
Marlin Williams
Defendant:
Mitch Daniels, James Donahue, Steve Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Martin et al
as 4:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
Earlie B A Berry, Jr
Defendant:
Walter Martin, J David Donahue, Sgt Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Martin et al
as 3:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
Earlie B A Berry, Jr
Defendant:
Walter Martin, J David Donahue, Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMILLAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2007cv00261
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW R. MCMILLAN
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. DONAHUE
as 2:2007cv00034
Petitioner:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. DONAHUE
as 1:2007cv00226
Plaintiff:
EARLIE BENEVOLENCE AARON BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
