Cases 71 - 80 of 840
Owens v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Keith Owens
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Sol D. Burke
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coley v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Terrance Coley
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloway v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Holloway
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salahuddin v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Khalil A. Salahuddin
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. White
as 2:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Wayne Alexander Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rick White and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Venable v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Demetric Markie Venable
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn, Honorable D. Arthur Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Sol D. Burke
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Ball-Bey v. Kyle Chandler, et al
as 24-1417
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ball-Bey
Defendant:
Kyle Chandler, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Ronald E. Vaughn, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Samuel Dotson, III, Former Police Chief and others
Puller v. Dotson et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Toccara Yvonne Puller and Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Adam Krischer and Judge Fiorre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.