Cases 71 - 80 of 1,088
Vaughn v. Baron et al
as 3:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jason Vaughn
Defendant:
Kristin Baron, Shanley, Cuervo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Coleman v. Charles et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Coleman
Defendant:
Sandra Charles, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Doherty et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Amauri Rodriguez
Defendant:
Daniel Doherty, Batten, F. Saleh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Devonia Long, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Jason Howard
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. N.H. County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Darnell Walker
Defendant:
N.H. County Jail, District Administrator, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. UCONN Health et al
as 3:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Tyrrell Brown
Defendant:
UCONN Health Dept. of Otolaryngology, C.E.O., Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. UConn Health Dept of Otalaryngology et al
as 3:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Tyrrell Brown
Defendant:
UConn Health Dept of Otalaryngology, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Rashod Akeem Newton
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
