Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Ollie Evans v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 13-60769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER EPPS, JOHNNIE DENMARK, also known as John Doe and others
Bosarge v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen Bosarge
Defendant:
Christopher Epps , Ron King , Chiquita Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raines v. Box
as 1:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dwayne Raines
Defendant:
Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ollie Evans v. Ronal Woodall, et al
as 13-60711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR RONAL WOODALL, CONSTANTINE P. CHAROGLU, Medical Doctor, DOCTOR CHARMAN MCCLEAVE and others
Hubbard v. South Mississippi Correctional Institute et al
as 2:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Hubbard
Defendant:
South Mississippi Correctional Institute, Lt. Bonner and Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollie Evans v. Ronal Woodall, et al
as 13-60641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR RONAL WOODALL, CONSTANTINE P. CHAROGLU, Medical Doctor, DOCTOR CHARMAN MCCLEAVE and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
PRO SE DEPARTMENT
Nelson v. Bingham et al
as 2:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Owen Nelson
Defendant:
Margaret Bingham , State Parole Board and Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frechou v. King et al
as 2:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
Brian Frechou
Defendant:
Ron King, Johnnie Denmark, Robert Krebs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frechou v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
Brian Frechou
Defendant:
Ron King, Johnnie Denmark, Robert Krebs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Denmark et al
as 1:2013cv00547
Plaintiff:
Alphonso T. Ward
Defendant:
Johnnie Denmark , Joy Ross , Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
