Cases 71 - 80 of 96
Simmons v. Giurbino et al
as 3:2011cv02169
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
George Giurbino, Greg D. Lewis, K. Cruise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
Simmons et al v. Carro et al
as 1:2011cv01542
Plaintiff:
Joseph Simmons, Arthur Franklin and Yvonne Harris
Defendant:
Judge Carro, Daniel Hubert, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Simmons v. The United States et al
as 3:2011cv00866
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
The United States, Edmund Jerry Brown, Robert Moosy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. The United States et al
as 3:2010cv04320
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
The United States, Jerry Brown, Robert Moossy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00732
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Thomas L. Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Adams et al
as 1:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
Deral G. Adams, A. Cruz and T. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 10-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK A. MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL and others
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. K. Williams, et al
as 10-15825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
K. WILLIAMS, T. VIRGA and JAMES WALKER
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
