Cases 71 - 80 of 854
Ofori v. Davis et al
as 7:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Zook et al
as 7:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Anderson, B.J. Ravizee, J.W. Carico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uzzle v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Uzzle
Defendant:
Randy Boyd, Vicky Williams, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uzzle v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Uzzle
Defendant:
Randy Boyd, Vicky Williams, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Coles et al
as 7:2023cv00624
Petitioner:
Jazzman L. Daniel
Defendant:
Coles, Sgt. K. Boyd, Sgt. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phoenix v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Phoenix
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Dr. Mark Amonette, Steve Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Robinson v. Punturi et al
as 1:2023cv01312
Petitioner:
Adrian Oneil Robinson
Respondent:
Kevin Punturi and K. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goode v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01274
Petitioner:
Nasir K. Goode
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
