Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Hamer #787762 v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
Shadney Hamer #787762
Defendant:
Kent, County of , Prison Health Services, Inc. , Daniel Carrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abraham v. Kent County Jail Administration et al
as 1:2012cv01233
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Abraham
Defendant:
Kent County Jail Administration and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison v. Stelma et al
as 1:2012cv01145
Plaintiff:
Charles Harry Madison
Defendant:
Larry Stelma, Kent County Jail, Corizon Medical Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sleighter v. Kent County Jail Administration et al
as 1:2012cv01008
Plaintiff:
Bradley Keith Sleighter
Defendant:
Kent County Jail Administration and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Kent County Correctional Facility
as 2:2012cv14074
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lindsey
Defendant:
Kent County Correctional Facility
Johnson v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2012cv00935
Plaintiff:
Douglas T. Johnson
Defendant:
Kent, County of, Kent County Sheriff's Department and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sleighter v. Kent County Jail Administration et al
as 1:2012cv00910
Plaintiff:
Bradley Keith Sleighter
Defendant:
Kent County Jail Administration and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Langford v. Kent County Circuit Court
as 12-2007
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT L. LANGFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, named as Kent County Circuit Court, 17th Circuit
Sleighter v. Kent County Jail Administration
as 1:2012cv00763
Plaintiff:
Bradley Keith Sleighter
Defendant:
Kent County Jail Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langford #156621 v. Klee
as 1:2012cv00311
Petitioner:
Robert Langford #156621
Respondent:
Kent County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
