Cases 71 - 80 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00052
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shaw v. Schnabel et al
as 3:2009cv00780
Plaintiff:
Sergio L Shaw
Defendant:
Meg Schnabel, Brian Healy, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Hantzis v. Peter Shaw, et al
as 09-17890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW HANTZIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER L. SHAW, Appellate Commissioner, JERALD LEE BRAININ, Esquire, KEVIN M. LALLY and others
Shaw, Sergio L. v. Neumaier, Officer
as 3:2009cv00747
Plaintiff:
Sergio L. Shaw
Defendant:
Officer Neumaier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Hantzis v. Peter Shaw, et al
as 09-17659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW HANTZIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER L. SHAW, Appellate Commissioner, JERALD LEE BRAININ, Esquire, KEVIN M. LALLY and others
Shaw v. Texas Depart of Criminal Justice System & Employees et al
as 2:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
David L Shaw
Defendant:
Texas Depart of Criminal Justice System & Employees, Brad Livingston, Brian Rodeen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Tucker et al
as 5:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
David L Shaw
Defendant:
Terry Tucker, NFN Griffin, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawley v. Moore et al
as 1:2009cv00850
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hawley
Defendant:
Ray M Moore, Floyd A Landrey and Ethan L Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2009cv00361
Petitioner:
David L Shaw
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oscar Shaw v. University of TX Medical Br, et al
as 09-20478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR L SHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, DOUGLAS APPEL, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
