Cases 71 - 80 of 212
Whitaker v. Kempt et al
as 6:2019cv00349
Defendant:
Assist DA Christi Lane, Sgt. FNU Loftis, Capt. FNU Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew PJ Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Divsion, Pamela Thelke et al
as 4:2019cv02939
Respondent:
Persons under Color as U.S. District Judges and Clerks, Deputy Clerks, District Courts, Austin and Waco Divisions, U.S. District and Appeals Courts, District of Columbia per persons misrepresenators of Judges, Clerks, and deputy clerks, Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Divsion, Pamela Thelke and others
Petitioner:
Samuel James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Yeakel et al
as 1:2019cv00584
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Mark Lane, Judge Lee Yeakel and Judge Sam Sparks
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker, Jr. v. Lange et al
as 6:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Vernon Tyrell Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Eddy Lane, CO FNU Jefferson and Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutherland v. Akins et al
as 4:2019cv00216
Defendant:
Officer Gay, Rick Denney, Monica Daughtery and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutherland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. USA
as 4:2019cv00004
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Audry Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Buttz v. Akin
as 4:2019cv00002
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Buttz, Jr
Defendant:
N Lane Akin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00975
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Audry Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lane v. Brockman et al
as 3:2018cv02745
Defendant:
PA L Brockman, Warden M Underwood and Lt D Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Davis et al
as 2:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lane
Defendant:
Warden NFN Richardson, Lorie Davis, Ric Vogelgesang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
