Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 148
Morel-Helena v. Wall
as 1:2017cv00441
Respondent: A.T. Wall and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner: Daurin Morel-Helena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cimaglio v. Wall et al
as 1:2017cv00432
Plaintiff: Louis Cimaglio
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall , Fred Vohr , Dale Fogarty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipscomb v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2017cv00298
Petitioner: Anthony Lipscomb
Respondent: State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lipscomb v. State of Rhode Island
as 16-2445
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY LIPSCOMB
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Lipscomb v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2016cv00446
Plaintiff: Anthony Lipscomb
Defendant: State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randall v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00255
Plaintiff: Charles Randall
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oliveira v. Wall et al
as 1:2016cv00162
Petitioner: James Oliveira
Respondent: Ashbel T. Wall and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Wall, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00096
Petitioner: Lorenzo Robinson Evans
Respondent: Ashbel T. Wall, II and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evans v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2016cv00026
Petitioner: Lorenzo Robinson Evans
Respondent: State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mattatall v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00012
Petitioner: Stephen Roy Mattatall
Respondent: Ashbel T. Wall and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?