Cases 71 - 80 of 1,328
Cornejo v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 2:2018cv00572
Petitioner:
Jesse Cornejo
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephen Putnam v. Attorney General for the State
as 18-15346
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN E. PUTNAM
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Fidel Goni v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 18-55011
Petitioner - Appellant:
FIDEL PEREZ GONI
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and BARRY REDDISH
Bland v. Attorney General of the State of California
as 3:2017cv02570
Petitioner:
Joshua Davis Bland
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
George Bridgette v. Donald Hill, et al
as 17-56867
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE BRIDGETTE
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD R. HILL, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and DANIEL E. LUNGREN
Willie Lyons v. Theodore White, et al
as 17-17358
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE CARL LYONS
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODORE WHITE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Helen Purdy v. Attorney General of the State
as 17-16946
Petitioner - Appellant:
HELEN SOPHIA PURDY
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Garcia v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv01923
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Garcia
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Director of Corrections, The and Attorney General of the State of California, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman v. Madden et al
as 3:2017cv00982
Petitioner:
Sergio Ramirez Guzman
Respondent:
Raymond Madden and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Putnam v. Attorney General of the State of California
as 2:2017cv00832
Petitioner:
Stephen E. Putnam
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
