Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Knight v. Patterson
as 1:2010cv00240
Petitioner:
Darwin G. Knight
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Houston v. Patterson et al
as 5:2010cv01120
Petitioner:
Vic Demone Houston
Respondent:
Tony Patterson and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Patterson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00280
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Brown
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephens v. Patterson et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Stanley Stephens
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomlin v. Patterson
as 1:2010cv00120
Petitioner:
Phillip Wayne Tomlin
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abrams v. Patterson et al
as 2:2010cv00138
Petitioner:
Roderick Dewayne Abrams
Respondent:
Tony Patterson and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Patterson
as 1:2010cv00034
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Harris
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tubbs v. Patterson et al
as 2:2009cv02465
Petitioner:
Willie Edward Tubbs
Respondent:
Tony Patterson and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Patterson et al
as 1:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Tony Patterson, Alfred Ingram, Henri Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethel v. Patterson et al
as 1:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
Garron Van Bethel
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
