Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 270
ORR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01831
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ORR
Defendant: ERIC HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ST CLAIR BEY v. STORM et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff: MAYSON ST CLAIR BEY
Defendant: STORM, VANIHEL, GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff: JARMAH HILL
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, BEN LALOUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKINGBOTTOM v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00441
Petitioner: MICHAEL HICKINGBOTTOM
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCMULLIN v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00440
Petitioner: SHAWN MCMULLIN
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GILBERT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff: DARYL GILBERT
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, RICHARD WHITE, PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FELLOWS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff: AARON FELLOWS
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BESS v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2023cv00420
Plaintiff: JAMAAR C. BESS
Defendant: CENTURION, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00419
Plaintiff: MARTEZ BROWN
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, JAY HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. NICHOLS et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant: SHADRAK NICHOLS, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?