Cases 71 - 80 of 154
Carter v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00389
Petitioner:
Jerry Carter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carter v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv00360
Plaintiff:
Keithlan L. Carter
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Joe Chase, Jonathan Counts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 2:2015cv04020
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Erin Rye, Paul Andrew Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Huterson et al
as 2:2014cv04314
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
Kenny Huterson , Loratea Akers , Vickie Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Mossman et al
as 2:2014cv04203
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
Mike Mossman, Janet Heyer, Bonnie Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neill v. Beetem et al
as 2:2014cv04169
Plaintiff:
Krisda J. Neill
Defendant:
Jon E Beetem, Thomas Chapman, Jeremiah Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Kefer et al
as 2:2014cv04071
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
Jason Kefer, David Hunter and John "Ed" Buckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Six Unknown Fulton State Hospital - S.O.R.T.S. Dietary Workers et al
as 2:2014cv04046
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
Six Unknown Fulton State Hospital - S.O.R.T.S. Dietary Workers and So-3 Registered Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Rye et al
as 2:2014cv04026
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
Erin Rye , Paul Andrew Gray , Mandwell Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bussie v. Andrews
as 4:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Robert C. Andrews, John Boehner, Marco Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
