Cases 71 - 80 of 1,583
Wright v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Laquan Wright
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, D. Williams, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. USA
as 4:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
William Wellington Hooper, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thomas v. Meyer
as 7:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Lamar Thomas
Defendant:
William C. Meyer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uzzle v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Uzzle
Defendant:
Randy Boyd, Vicky Williams, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uzzle v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Uzzle
Defendant:
Randy Boyd, Vicky Williams, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00637
Petitioner:
William White, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Mr. Spears
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Junior Williams
Defendant:
Mr. Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
v. McNeely et al
as 2:2023cv00489
Respondent:
William Junior McNeely and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Maxey et al
as 7:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
G. T. Maxey, Timothy W. Allen, William N. Alexander, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Lt. KM Fleming, Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
