Cases 81 - 90 of 740
Jones v. Sheriff Dept - DCSO et al
as 3:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Aureus Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff Dept - DCSO, Nojdar Shemssulldin, f/n/u Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Clendenion
as 2:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Daniel H Jones
Respondent:
Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Spangler et al
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Jones
Defendant:
Jerry Spangler, Jim Casey and Christopher Hugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pike v. Helton et al
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Christa Pike
Defendant:
Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson, Gloria Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02562
Petitioner:
Stefon Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2022cv02588
Plaintiff:
Keylone Jones
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Kirk Fields, Shelby County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclin v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kentron Maclin, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Mike Parris, Steve Jones, Stacey Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Centurion et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Leslie Jones
Defendant:
Centurion, Dr. Mark Fowler, Dr. (f/n/u) Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wall et al
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Lt Wall, Sgt Evans, Cpl Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swann v. Sexton et al
as 3:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Blake O Swann
Defendant:
Keith Sexton, Washington County Court, George P Jones Justice Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
