Cases 81 - 90 of 298
Person Sr. #660430 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Roderick Harold Person Sr. #660430
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, MDOC Bureay of Healthcare, Adam Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Churn #165703 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00631
Plaintiff:
Ladon S. Churn #165703
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Diane Christiansen, Steve Karber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams #462766 v. Robinson et al
as 1:2021cv00572
Plaintiff:
David Adams #462766
Defendant:
Marshaun Robinson, Matt MaCauley, Joshua M. Langdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Foremost Insurance
as 1:2021cv00542
Plaintiff:
Tyler Adam Thomas
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herndon #136007 v. Davids et al
as 1:2021cv00458
Defendant:
Adam Yuhas, John Davids and E. Simon
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor #940436 v. Yuhas et al
as 1:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Unknown Bookie, Katie Minard, David Maranka and others
Plaintiff:
Davariol Marquavis Taylor #940436
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall #601852 v. Foster et al
as 2:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
Larry Stovall #601852
Defendant:
Unknown Green, Unknown Carlson, Unknown Holdwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton #495156 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Unknown Kerr, U. Davids, Unknown Odunuga and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Burton #495156
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers #447843 v. Roy
as 1:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Sean Adam Rogers #447843
Defendant:
Unknown Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams #389698 v. Jackson
as 1:2020cv01198
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Petitioner:
Cameron Lenell Adams #389698
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
