Cases 81 - 90 of 684
MORRIS v. CROWDER
as 5:2022cv00142
Petitioner:
MIMS MICHAEL MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MATTHEW B CROWDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Crowder
as 1:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Mims Michael Morris and Mims Michael Morris, Jr.
Respondent:
Matthew B. Crowder
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cross v. GRIFFIN et al
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Defendant:
SABRIYA GRIFFIN and Attorney Chavene B. King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnette v. Woodard et al
as 2:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Acgem Joshua Barnette
Defendant:
Stephanie D. Woodard, B. E. Roberts, Rainey Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Charles B. Webster Detention Center et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jamario Anderson
Defendant:
Charles B. Webster Detention Center, Cease Moore and Jaylen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibby v. Woods
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Trenton B. Gibby
Defendant:
Sheriff Lynn Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baird v. Benton et al
as 4:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Marty Lamar Baird
Defendant:
Warden Brooks Benton, Z. Jones, Betterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Jenkins
as 1:2022cv00389
Petitioner:
Joe B. Russell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munson v. DeKalb County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Munson, Jr.
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huskins v. Bennett et al
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Gist Huskins
Defendant:
Detective L. Bennett and Detective B. Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
