Cases 81 - 90 of 1,374
Burress v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv02636
Petitioner:
Kevin Owen Burress
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden John Doe of Robert A Deyton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v.JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
as 5:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANORRIS MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Long
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv02495
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
William, Sgt. Atkins, Ct. L. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin et al v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D. Franklin and Timothy Long
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webber v. Fort et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Karl Fort, Georgia Department of Corrections, Georgia Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EDWARDS v. WILSON et al
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
WILSON, BERRY, CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Philbin et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Womack
Defendant:
Warden Edwin Philbin, Ruthie Shelton, Dr. Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN M FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILKES, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitt v. City of Fairburn, GA et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Myron Pitt
Defendant:
City of Fairburn, GA, Officer John Doe and Fairburn Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
