Cases 81 - 90 of 274
CORMICAN v. MORRIS et al
as 3:2018cv00081
Defendant:
MITZI HALL DON, DeAnn Morris, Lt. Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELIAS CORMILYN and James Elias Cormican
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORMILYN v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2018cv00370
Defendant:
MITZI HALL DON, DEANN MORRIS and DEPUTY WARDEN FRANKLIN
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELIAS CORMILYN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00194
Defendant:
MS IRWIN, JANE DOE, BILLY WICKER and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Taylor et al
as 3:2018cv00060
Defendant:
Lt. Franklin, Lt. Shannette Taylor, Officer Wilcher and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Taylor et al
as 6:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
Officer Welcher, Lt. Shannette Taylor, Lt. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. SISK et al
as 3:2018cv00114
Defendant:
SGT TAMMY, CAPTAIN SISK, LT CLAY and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. FRANKLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 3:2018cv00091
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. FRANKLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 3:2018cv00086
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SERGEANT CONNIE, SGT MYIA and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2018cv00084
Defendant:
JANE DOES, JOHN DOE, THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargreaves v. Franklin et al
as 4:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Chad Hargreaves
Defendant:
Herbert Buzz Franklin, Leonard C. Gregor, Jr., Stephanie Palmer Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
