Cases 81 - 90 of 112
Corona v. USA et al
as 4:2011cv00138
Petitioner:
Raul Espinoza Corona
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, G.E.O., Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvarez v. USA et al
as 4:2011cv00142
Petitioner:
Javier Aguilar Alvarez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, G.E.O., Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McMullin v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Bobbie McMullin
Defendant:
E. Bravo, Lupe Martinez and G.E.O.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Gill et al
as 4:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
Chasity Gill, B. Miza, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Rice et al
as 4:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
Micheal Rice, G.E.O. Group, Inc. and E. L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. D.O.C. et al
as 1:2011cv00938
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Sandoval
Defendant:
D.O.C., Lupe Martinez, G.E.O. Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jolley v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Jolley, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and G.E.O. Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales-Cervantes v. USA et al
as 4:2011cv00078
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, G.E.O. Group, Inc., Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Hector Morales-Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Martinez et al
as 1:2011cv00581
Plaintiff:
Alec Jay Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Martinez, Gary King, Timothy Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Mize et al
as 4:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Unknown Mize, Unknown Holcome, G.E.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
