Cases 81 - 90 of 2,052
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Lee Malone
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester v. Chester County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Michael Hester
Defendant:
Chester County, Tennessee, Blair Weaver, Mark Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanders
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Brandon Watwood and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Timothy Evans
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mount v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert Jesse Mount
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Matson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
James Wilson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Weaver v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Christian J. Weaver
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
