Cases 81 - 90 of 118
King et al v. State of Missouri
as 2:2010cv04063
Plaintiff:
Matthew J King and Similar Situated
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2010cv03111
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Barnett
Defendant:
Marty C. Anderson, J E Krueger, G Baysinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Checo v. King et al
as 6:2010cv03106
Plaintiff:
Miguel Checo
Defendant:
Robert King and Phillip Wittmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Howard v. Long et al
as 6:2010cv03068
Plaintiff:
Leslie Bernard Howard
Defendant:
Billy Long, J. B. King and Bill Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Blake
as 4:2010cv00195
Petitioner:
Matthew J King
Respondent:
Alan Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eddington v. King et al
as 6:2010cv03047
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Eddington
Defendant:
Robert King, Paul Celestin, Marty C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
King v. State of Missouri
as 4:2009cv02057
Petitioner:
Lloyd King
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ventura-Vera v. Dewitt et al
as 6:2009cv03391
Plaintiff:
Juan Ventura-Vera
Defendant:
Tatem Dewitt, Mitchell Donald Thomas, Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walden v. Marshall Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2009cv00832
Plaintiff:
Joshua C Walden
Defendant:
Marshall Missouri Police Department, Jason Coney, Jon Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goddard, et al v. Blake, et al.
as 4:2009cv01546
Plaintiff:
Michael Goddard, Matthew J. King, John R. Van Orden and others
Defendant:
Alan Blake, Jonathan Rosenboom, Linda Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
