Cases 81 - 90 of 1,308
Peterson v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv11493
Plaintiff:
Toran Peterson
Defendant:
Madeline Young, Ronald W. Chapman, Jeffrey L. Bomber and others
Estes v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv11470
Plaintiff:
Larry Wendell Estes
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Dixon v. Chapman
as 5:2023cv11474
Petitioner:
Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Willis Chapman
Bonham #680736 v. Laurain et al
as 1:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Kevin Emanuel Bonham #680736
Defendant:
Unknown Laurain, Michigan Department of Corrections and Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade #434839 v. Braman, et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Dione Andre Wade #434839
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kristie Marie Van Harn and Melinda Braman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #637399 v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones #637399
Defendant:
C. Smith, J. Basye, Unknown Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv11199
Plaintiff:
Dione Andre Wade
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kristie Marie Van Harn and Melinda Braman
Bishop Perry v. MDOC, et al
as 23-1446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BISHOP R. PERRY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAGGAGI
Galeski #829281 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
David Galeski #829281, Jr., David P. Galeski #829281, Jr. and David Itrich
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Director of MDOC Heidi E. Washington and Heidi E. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles #439074 v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Kennith Myles #439074
Defendant:
Unknown Carr, Unknown Miller, Matt Macauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
