Cases 81 - 90 of 172
Espinoza v. Irby et al
as 4:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Adrien Joshua Espinoza
Defendant:
Phillip Irby, Unknown Young, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08094
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Terrance Ardell Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ohman #189498 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv03909
Petitioner:
Phillip M Ohman
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ohman #189498 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv03292
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ohman
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Maureen Johnson, Unknown Lawson and others
Movant:
William Sanders and Edward Lee Tongen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Johannes et al
as 4:2016cv00622
Plaintiff:
Julio Allen
Defendant:
L Johannes, Unknown Sylva, Unknown Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ohman #189498 v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv03235
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Phillip M Ohman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv02290
Plaintiff:
Manuel Angel Rodriguez Diaz
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Unknown White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carstens v. USA
as 2:2016cv01527
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jon Phillip Carstens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Eldridge #147718 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv01475
Plaintiff:
Joseph Eldridge
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections , Jose Andrade , Daniel Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips #222421 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv01319
Petitioner:
Douglas Paul Phillips
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
