Cases 81 - 90 of 1,525
Grimes v. Noe et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Guy Noe, Mitchell, N Estelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mays v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Johnson, Moreno, Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Neves
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams
Defendant:
Nicholas Neves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lamont Williams
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Captain Shea Brown, Michael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mobile County Metro Jail
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kameron Williams
Defendant:
Mobile County Metro Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thigpen v. Golson et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Theron Thigpen
Defendant:
Brian Golson, Lane Thompson and William Schuelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Tahir Siddiq, David Lamar, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Karen Carter, Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Brian Thompkins, David Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Thompkins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Brian Thompkins, David Lamar, Mr. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
