Cases 1 - 10 of 24,965
Majid v. Nurse Practioner Everln May et al
as 0:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Shahid Majid
Defendant:
Nurse Practioner Everln May, Nurse Practioner Lilian Emetu, Medical Director Wanda Sermons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brooks v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv03511
Petitioner:
Emonte Brooks
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wazney v. Sumter County
as 3:2024cv03436
Plaintiff:
Robert W Wazney
Defendant:
Sumter County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Seabrooke v. BCDC
as 6:2024cv03434
Plaintiff:
John Seabrooke
Defendant:
BCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cutshaw v. Sterlin ET AL et al
as 0:2024cv01947
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Cutshaw
Defendant:
Brian Sterlin ET AL, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lt Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gaillard v. Hill-Finklea Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv03496
Plaintiff:
Percy Devon Gaillard
Defendant:
Hill-Finklea Detention Center, Major Anthony Fyall, Cpt. Archie Beau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv03441
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Wright
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Spartanburg County et al
as 6:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Deandre L Fuller
Defendant:
Spartanburg County and Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Tabata v. City of Hanahan et al
as 2:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Luxolo Tabata
Defendant:
City of Hanahan, Mildred Rowell and Private First Class Goss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
McClellan v. Stirling
as 9:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
