Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 308
Garrett v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00614
Defendant: Rick Alsbrook, Bryan Parks, Paula Hill and others
Plaintiff: Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurley v. Corbin et al
as 7:2024cv00605
Defendant: Sgt. Rakes, Susan M. Holcomb, Major O-Dell and others
Plaintiff: Joshua Adam Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Davidson et al
as 7:2024cv00539
Defendant: Tracy Davidson and Eddie Adams
Plaintiff: Jullian A. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00535
Defendant: Lt. Flemings, Unit Manager Cauhthorn, Ms. Church and others
Plaintiff: Paul David DaQuan Lynch and Paul David Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam v. Crawford et al
as 3:2024cv00562
Plaintiff: Rakibu Adam
Defendant: Jeffrey Crawford and Russell Hott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Santos et al
as 1:2024cv01388
Plaintiff: Karsten Obed Allen
Defendant: F. Santos, Ms. Adams, J. Gloss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie, Jr. v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00496
Defendant: Ms. Church, Michael Pozeq, S. Caughron and others
Plaintiff: Jules Moultrie, Jr., III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Davidson et al
as 1:2024cv01338
Defendant: Eddie Adams and Tracy Davidson
Plaintiff: Jullian A. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eggleston v. St. Amor et al
as 7:2024cv00476
Plaintiff: Joshua Adam Eggleston
Defendant: Wellford Health Care, Nurse Ryan, Wellpath Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Defour v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00472
Defendant: Investigator Stanley, Special Agent Acosta, Sergeant Steffey and others
Plaintiff: Jeremy Defour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?