Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Davidson v. Owens et al
as 1:2023cv04807
Plaintiff:
Cannon Davidson
Defendant:
Craig D. Owens and Wellpath Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McRae v. Davidson
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
John Willie McRae
Defendant:
Sheriff Sim Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Davidson
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Micheal Oshey Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Sim Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Davidson
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Oshey Williams and John Willie McRae
Defendant:
Sheriff Sim Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Well Path et al
as 1:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Cannon Davidson
Defendant:
Well Path, Sheriff Craig Owens, Deputy Barnes and others
Not Classified By Court:
Cobb County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. STEVEN et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Petitioner:
DARRELL D CROSS
Respondent:
SHERIFF CHRISTOPHER STEVEN and DAVIDSON SIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIDSON v. AKUNWANNE et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERALD A DAVIDSON
Defendant:
Doctor IKECHUKWU AKUNWANNE, Warden WALTER BERRY, LIEUTENANT STEPHEN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIDSON v. AKUNWANNE et al
as 5:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
GERALD A DAVIDSON
Defendant:
Doctor IKECHUKWU AKUNWANNE, Warden WALTER BERRY, LIEUTENANT STEPHEN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSS v. DAVIDSON et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Burke, KECIA DAVIDSON, SERGEANT LOCKETTE and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSS v. DAVIDSON et al
as 5:2020cv00337
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SID ANDREWS, OFFICER GORDON, KECIA DAVIDSON and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL D CROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
