Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Diarra v. Bell et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Sgt. Bell, Officer Hood and DeKalb County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naji v. City of Augusta et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Issac Ali Naji
Defendant:
City of Augusta, Richmond County Sheriff's Office, Officer Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
Commissioner TYRONE OLIVER, Warden SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. Bowman
as 2:2022cv00123
Petitioner:
Gregory Dante Hood
Respondent:
Sheriff William Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McFarland v. Cobb County Government et al
as 1:2022cv03494
Plaintiff:
Chance McFarland and Catherine
Defendant:
Cobb County Government, State of Georgia Government, Cobb County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 3:2021cv00127
Petitioner:
PAUL M HOOD
Respondent:
WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Walton County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv04556
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Hood
Defendant:
Walton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Fulton County Superior Court Criminal Court et al
as 1:2020cv01865
Petitioner:
Jimmie Hood
Respondent:
Fulton County Superior Court Criminal Court and Magistrate Judge New Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hood v. Chapman
as 1:2018cv00374
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Hood
Defendant:
Joe Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
