Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Halbert v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Natalie Dawn Halbert
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mency v. Baggett et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Iariannia Daterria Mency
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Melinda Humphrey, Dawn McRae and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv01015
Petitioner:
Crystal Dawn Wood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pickett v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Joe Ranger Pickett
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Mark Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Campbell et al
as 1:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Jody Campbell, Hallie Scott Dixon and Chandra Dawn Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varden v. The City of Clanton
as 2:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Christy Dawn Varden
Defendant:
The City of Clanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Bentley et al
as 2:2011cv04348
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Perkins
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Robert Danford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ligon v. The Alabama Department of Corrections, Classification Division (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv01093
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Ligon
Defendant:
The Alabama Department of Corrections, Classification Division , Dawn McRae and Rebecca Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew v. Wheeler-White et al
as 2:2009cv01682
Petitioner:
Dawn Arlita Dew
Respondent:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dew v. Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
as 2:2009cv01147
Petitioner:
Dawn Dew
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
