Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Ashby v. Doyle et al
as 3:2023cv02968
Plaintiff:
Defonte Ashby
Defendant:
Robert T. Doyle, Roberto Walton and Beverly Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashby v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv07417
Petitioner:
Defonte T. Ashby
Respondent:
Robert T. Doyle
Defendant:
Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Goldstein et al
as 3:2022cv02962
Plaintiff:
Loureece Stone Clark
Defendant:
Mark H. Goldstein, James M. Kim, Robert T. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence Gene Kirkley v. Walter Trent Kirkley et al
as 5:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gene Kirkley and Lawrence Leon Kirkley
Defendant:
Walter Trent Kirkley, Michelle Duron, Brandy Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkley v. Kirkley et al
as 3:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gene Kirkley and Lawrence Leon Kirkley
Defendant:
Walter Trent Kirkley, Michelle Duron, Brandy Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Doyle Young v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2021cv05841
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00986
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Pitts v. Martinez Detention Facility Medical Staff, et al.
as 3:2021cv01846
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Emanuel Jeremiah Pitts
Defendant:
Martinez Detention Facility Medical Staff, Catuza, West County Detention Facility Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 3:2021cv01455
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
