Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Ward et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Cam Ward, Leigh Gwanthney, Darryl Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carstarphen v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Jr.
Defendant:
Noah Price Oliver, Q. Brown, Level Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. Laman
as 3:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antavis Oliver
Defendant:
David Laman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Laman
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antavis Oliver
Defendant:
David Laman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Oliver et al
as 3:2023cv00752
Petitioner:
Thomas Martin, Jr
Respondent:
Shannon Oliver and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomason v. Oliver et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jody Lee Thomason
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Deputy Warden Houston and Captain Stallworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
