Cases 1 - 10 of 21
SMITH v. HAMSLEY et al
as 2:2023cv16586
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL HAMSLEY, SHARON SEGLIBENE, TRACY WILDONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
WILLIAMS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv00573
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and TRACY SHIMONIS-KAMINSKI
Petitioner:
MARK S. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, NJ et al
as 1:2018cv15986
Defendant:
DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, NJ and GARY M. LANIGAN
Plaintiff:
TRACY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADKINS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06174
Plaintiff:
TRACY ADKINS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2016cv05794
Plaintiff:
TRACI MOSS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURMER et al v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2016cv03022
Plaintiff:
JOEL E. DURMER, TRACY GEE, ANTHONY DIXON and others
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, SHERRY YATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASSON v. HIGHTOWER
as 1:2016cv01552
Petitioner:
BRIAN WASSON
Respondent:
TRACY HIGHTOWER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MICHELE v. QUELOPANA et al
as 2:2015cv06248
Plaintiff:
DIKEN MICHELE
Defendant:
G. QUELOPANA, HILONGOS, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
