Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 40,452
Bennett v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff: Danny Bennett
Defendant: Augusta State Med. Prison, Black Panter and Georgia Department of Corrections - Office of Professional Standers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorer v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff: Demarcus B. Moorer, Sr.
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Watson
as 2:2024cv00261
Respondent: Kochelle Watson
Petitioner: Stephen Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OLIVER v. OLIVER
as 6:2024cv00065
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10, CENTURION OF GEORGIA LLC and MHM Correctional Services, LLC
Plaintiff: ANTHONY J OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs v. Chabaneou
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: Daniel Eugene Riggs
Defendant: Lt. Amy Chabaneou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. HUNDING
as 5:2024cv00400
Plaintiff: KARREEM SAMUEL JONES
Defendant: DEPUTY COUNSELOR JO HUNDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. JEFFRIES et al
as 5:2024cv00401
Defendant: WARDEN JEFFRIES, COUNSELOR BOYNER and WARDEN JONES
Plaintiff: DAVID RYAN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv05144
Petitioner: David E. Campbell
Respondent: Merrick Garland, Johnson, Terrence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00113
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Whatley v. Wade et al
as 4:2024cv00265
Defendant: Leigh Patterson, Cathy Taylor, Dustin Wade and others
Plaintiff: Jonathan Benjamin Whatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?