Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Martin v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Cory Adam Martin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Divenuti et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Bein Divenuti, Martin and Landy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Accomack County Sheriff's Office, Wayne Greer, Donnie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
John Robert Martin, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Robert Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Kendal Martin
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton and D. Squire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Danville City Jail et al
as 7:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Danville City Jail, Capt. Patty, Major Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Virginia Attorney General et al
as 3:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Virginia Attorney General, Ken Baldassari, James C. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
