Cases 1 - 10 of 353
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samassa v. Golden et al
as 2:2024cv02201
Plaintiff:
Djibril H. Samassa
Defendant:
Officer Golden, Officer Taylor, Officer Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooden v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant:
William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Lipman
as 2:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
Sheryl H. Lipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyle et al v.
as 1:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
Lowell H Kyle, Sr, Colton Drake Clingan, Larry Leland Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Britt
Defendant:
Jeff Cassidy, Carswell, Brian Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Hassan Jackson
Defendant:
Donald H. Allen, Jerry Woodall and Shaun A Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilgar v. Carroll County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Andrew H Hilgar
Defendant:
Carroll County, Tennessee, Karl Jackson and Andy Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Gary Montgomery
Defendant:
Philip E. Smith, Lesley Burnett Montgomery, Doug Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
