Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Benitez-Diaz, Alberto et al v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00369
Petitioner:
Alberto Benitez-Diaz, Cesar Serrano-Nieto, Jairo Salazar-Dominguez and others
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez v. Tegels
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Roberto I Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez, Ted v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Ted Lopez
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01304
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dominguez-Lopez v. Ludwig et al
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Dominguez-Lopez and Gerardo Dominquez-Lopez
Defendant:
J Ludwig, K Pelky, H Hollander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra-Lopez, David v. Brook
as 3:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brook
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra-Lopez, David v. Brook
as 3:2021cv00624
Plaintiff:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brook
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra-Lopez, David v. Fuchs, Larry
as 3:2021cv00363
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Respondent:
Larry Fuchs
Petitioner:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Zuidmulder et al
as 2:2020cv01209
Defendant:
Hon Donald R Zuidmulder, Scott Brisbens, Jeffrey Cano and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bernard Lopez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
