Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Mauder v. Petri et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mauder
Defendant:
CO Petri, Lt. Rosinski and Deputy Warden Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
Warden Nicholas, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Mrs. Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C. BROWN
Defendant:
LAKEISHA COOPER, MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MORGAN
Defendant:
OFFICER ALEJANDRO ORTIZ, CORPORAL JARED DAVIS and COATESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2023cv04948
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and LAKEISHA A. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagan v. Morton
as 1:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ortiz Pagan
Defendant:
Roxanne Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODLEY v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv04680
Plaintiff:
RONALD WOODLEY
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY, JOSEPH TERRA, MS. COLON-ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04578
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CURAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: JORGE ORTIZ
as 2:2023cv04152
Petitioner:
JORGE ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
