Cases 1 - 10 of 1,656
SMITH v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
ERIC SMITH
Defendant:
WELLPATH, DR. ANNINO, DR. LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SIPPLE et al
as 2:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
DEP. MANDY SIPPLE, UM. FANRAK, LT. CUNNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OTEY et al v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2024cv02205
Petitioner:
DENISE OTEY, LAWRENCE OTEY, GWENDOLYN GREEN and others
Respondent:
LAWRENCE KRASNER, ADA JONATHAN FRISBY and JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mojica-Carrion v. Smith
as 4:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Leonardo J. Mojica-Carrion
Defendant:
Eric D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BRYANT, DR. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Egizio v. Rivello et al
as 1:2024cv00767
Petitioner:
Tyler Smith-Egizio
Respondent:
Superintendent J. Rivello, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and PA Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. BARRAZA et al
as 2:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM LATEEF RAKIM SMITH
Defendant:
CARLOS BARRAZA, BRIAN MCCARTHY, PATRICK CARMODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
MCCANN v. PRIME CARE et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE, CHRISTIAN SMITH, MR. DECALVISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: SMITH
as 2:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
JERRY SMITH, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
