Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fiorito v United States of America et al.
as 0:2020cv02679
Defendant:
BOP General Counsel Doe, Mr. Brewer, Ian Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Commissioner Of Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2019cv01956
Defendant:
Megan MuCully, Katherine McDowell, Brian Ninnerman and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel I. Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Lourey et al
as 0:2019cv00684
Defendant:
John Doe, Jamie Houk, Donna Cronin and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Ronald Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles et al v. Brister et al
as 0:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles and David Hamilton
Defendant:
Jana Skye Brister Korby, Staci Bovin, Katherine McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Office of the Minnesota Attorney General et al
as 0:2014cv02929
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Aaron Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. United States of America
as 0:2014cv01413
Petitioner:
Dallas P. Brewer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, The Institute For Psychological & Sexual Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2013cv02958
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redding v Hanlon et al
as 0:2006cv04575
Plaintiff:
Nico Redding
Defendant:
Jan Hanlon, Ms. Karow, Sgt. Schleis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
