Cases 1 - 10 of 365
Rowley v. Barron
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
Ryan Rowley
Respondent:
R Caternolo and Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norton v. Barron
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Daniel Norton
Respondent:
R Caternolo and Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowe v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv05196
Petitioner:
Anthony C Rowe
Respondent:
Jack Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Barron et al
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Roslyn Demetriu Chapman
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and LoAnne Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bones et al v H.I.G. Capital LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bones, T. G. and C. G.
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital, LLC., Wellpath, County of Clallam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Dominguez
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Levi Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dixon v. Cole et al
as 4:2024cv05003
Plaintiff:
Robert E Dixon
Defendant:
Amanda Cole, A Hogar, C Kairos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06042
Plaintiff:
Richard Wesley Bryan
Defendant:
Shauna Johnson, Alison H Sonntag, Amber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blu v. Clallam County et al
as 3:2023cv06022
Plaintiff:
C Blu
Defendant:
Clallam County, Donald Wenzel, Tyler Cortani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolford v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01689
Petitioner:
Audrey Jean Wolford
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
