Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Larson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02227
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jessica Joyal, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jeremy Wouri, Sue Swansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Joyal et al
as 0:2021cv01847
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
D.H.S.-M.S.O.P, DHS-MSOP employees, Brooke Ness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Kevin D. Moser and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Johnston et al
as 0:2019cv02597
Plaintiff:
Ricky Mason
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Blake Carey, Jim Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Johnson Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Benson
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, Shelby Richardson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fageroos v. Richardson et al
as 0:2016cv04230
Plaintiff:
Richard Fageroos, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby Richardson, Kevin Moser, Blake Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartleib v. Carey et al
as 0:2015cv03357
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hartleib
Defendant:
Blake Carey, Paul Mayfield and Heidi Menard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
