Cases 1 - 10 of 63
CAREY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. CAREY, JR.
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00722
Petitioner:
Jesse Carey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Integrated Medical Solutions et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Clyde Jones
Defendant:
Integrated Medical Solutions, John Keelen, Diane Sommer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gayle v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Tyrin Gayle
Defendant:
United States, S. Mowatt, Rhea Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clayton v. Sommer et al
as 3:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Clayton
Defendant:
Diane Sommer, H. Walters, Carey Rhea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edwards et al v. Rivello et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edwards, John Hightower, Muwsa Green and others
Defendant:
J. Rivello, A. Wakefield, N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Deb et al
as 4:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Deb, Carey, Tiffany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. CAREY et al
as 2:2022cv03769
Plaintiff:
TASHA L EVANS
Defendant:
SERGEANT WILLIAM CAREY, JR., OFFICER JAY RATTMANN, OFFICER DANIEL MULLARKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carey v. USA
as 3:2022cv00946
Petitioner:
Jesse Carey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CAREY v. LARDIN et al
as 2:2021cv01408
Plaintiff:
DUWAN CAREY
Defendant:
DUWAYNE LARDIN and ANDREW KESSLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
