Cases 1 - 10 of 597
Mobley v. Rhoton et al
as 3:2024cv00951
Defendant:
Secretary Ricky D. Dixon, T. Rhoton, Patton and others
Plaintiff:
Jashon Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACHILLE v. DUVAL et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
RIDGH GENESIS ACHILLE
Defendant:
FELIX, DUVAL and T. RHSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Happel v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01970
Petitioner:
Shane Happel
Respondent:
Scott Duvall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Achille v. Duval et al
as 3:2024cv00840
Defendant:
Duval, T. Rhston and Felix
Plaintiff:
Ridgh Genesis Achille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACHILLE v. DUVAL et al
as 5:2024cv00180
Defendant:
R. QUINTERO, DUVAL and J. PETTIS
Plaintiff:
RIDGH GENESIS ACHILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Achille v. Duval et al
as 3:2024cv00790
Defendant:
J. Pettis, Duval and R. Quintero
Plaintiff:
Ridgh Genesis Achille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis Way v. Sheriff, Duval County, et al
as 24-12490
Defendant:
SHERIFF, DUVAL COUNTY and UNDERWRITER, et al
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANTONIO WAY
Salinas v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Defendant:
Sherriff Romeo R. Ramirez, Annabel C. Canales and Duval County
Plaintiff:
Roberto Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickerson v. Duval et al
as 3:2024cv03202
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dickerson
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Illinois, Joseph Felchner, Springfield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garver v. Baker County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00678
Defendant:
Baker County Sheriff, Duval County EMS Flight, Baker County EMS and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Garver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
