Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv30125
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall et al v. Capeless et al
as 3:2019cv30138
Defendant:
Rose Dawson, Erin Goffney, Joseph A Pieropan and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hall and EME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Montrond v. Spencer et al
as 1:2017cv10505
Plaintiff:
Amaral Montrond
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Thomas Turco, III, Michael Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Department of Children and Families
as 1:2016cv11320
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Hall
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12798
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hall
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Cousins et al
as 1:2013cv10307
Plaintiff:
Randell McClain
Defendant:
Frank G. Cousins, Jr., Michael Marks, Michael Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Springfield, City of et al
as 3:2013cv30002
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
Springfield, City of, Springfield Police Department and Detective Wadlegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thompson v. Early et al
as 4:2010cv40126
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
J. D. Early, Goulds, Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hager et al
as 1:2009cv12001
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams
Defendant:
D. J. Hager, Unknown "mental health watch officer", Massaschusetts Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moniz v. Hall et al
as 1:2009cv11645
Plaintiff:
Glenn Moniz
Defendant:
Timothy Hall, Luis Spencer, Michael Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
