Cases 1 - 10 of 1,842
Davis v. Zook et al
as 7:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Darren Nathaniel Davis
Defendant:
Warden David Zook, Assistant Warden J. Willington, Director Chadwick S. Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feagin v. Bass et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Christopher Feagin
Defendant:
Bass, Nabong, Baton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Brown, DDS, et al.
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
J. Brown, DDS and L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hunter Dixon
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, J. Artrip, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, David Anderson, Joseph D. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Novak
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Abir Ali
Defendant:
Judge David J. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Bateman
as 7:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Monte M. Stokes
Defendant:
Assistant Warden J. Bateman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
