Cases 1 - 10 of 498
MATTHEWS v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2024cv05156
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
JAMES FINNEGAN, CHRISTIAN HENRY, GERALD MCHUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethune v. Iagavino et al
as 1:2024cv01364
Defendant:
D.S.C.S. Nicklow, Correctional Officer Iagavino, C.H.C.A. Jon Altimus and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Julian Bethune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04108
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alward v. Allenwood LSCI et al
as 3:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Jeffrey Greene, Amy Boncher, T. Noon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burton v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv01175
Defendant:
Christopher Brownwell, Wendy Nicholas, Linda Chismar and others
Plaintiff:
Niara Safiya Garcia Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Michael Matthews
Defendant:
Diane Sommers, United States of America, Heather Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Olson v. Sage
as 1:2024cv01160
Respondent:
J. Sage
Petitioner:
Matthew John Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCHWAGER v. BEILEY et al
as 2:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES SCHWAGER, CHASE SCHWAGER and ADAM CHARLES
Defendant:
MATTHEW BEILEY and AMER WILLIAM WHITFEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RUCINSKI
as 2:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN HYRUM LANE
Defendant:
TRP. MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Matthew Alward
as 3:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
