Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Brunskill v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv06380
Plaintiff:
Dylan Richey Brunskill
Defendant:
K. Mitchell, Lt. Ramirez, Lt. Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnell G. Haddock v. El Monte Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv07589
Plaintiff:
Donnell G. Haddock
Defendant:
El Monte Police Department and El Monte Fire Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Hill et al
as 2:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Rick M. Hill, E. Aguilar, J Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rick M. Hill, Corr. Sergeant E. Aguilar, Corrections Lt. J. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Santana et al
as 3:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Wilson
Defendant:
J. Santana, E. Frijas, M. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) OCampo v. Gonsalez et al
as 1:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Alan Trinchera OCampo
Defendant:
Nancy Gonsalez, Fernando Montes, Armando Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montes v. Miller
as 4:2022cv07229
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Montes
Defendant:
Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022at00706
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Warden Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Montezello v. Pesce et al
as 2:2021cv00906
Defendant:
Pesce, Mott and Gaetano
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Montes and Raymond Montezello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
