Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Griffin v. Stonebreaker et al
as 1:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Gary Jason Griffin
Defendant:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker, Jr, Associate Warden Gause, Associate Warden Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Goss, Sr. v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv04331
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Goss, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Brown, Edward Moultrie, Vernon Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chisolm v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv03506
Plaintiff:
Don Survi Chisolm and Don-Survi Chisolm
Defendant:
Associate Warden Timothy Clark, Chaplain Moultrie, Brian Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. J. Reuben Long Detention Center
as 1:2019cv00152
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long Detention Center, Officer Michael, Officer Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Edward James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Moultrie et al
as 8:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Todd
Defendant:
Darius Moultrie, S Beadling, Cpl Legg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warrick et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv03326
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Ocean, Correctional Officer Sgt. Lockemy, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
James Hardin, John State, David Warrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hunt v. Eagleton et al
as 4:2015cv04142
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hunt
Defendant:
Willie J Eagleton, Annie Sellers, Captain Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moultrie v. McFadden
as 8:2015cv03661
Petitioner:
Antonio Moultrie
Respondent:
Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moultrie v. Reynolds
as 9:2015cv00198
Petitioner:
Stanley Lee Moultrie
Respondent:
NFN Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newcomb v. Miles et al
as 1:2014cv02048
Plaintiff:
Michael Drew Newcomb, Jr
Defendant:
Louis Miles, Perry Powell, R Moultry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
